One Nation:
Pio’s dream for Kenya
Pio Gama Pinto with Jomo Kenyatta at Maralal and other
members of the East Africa Goan League which was created by Pinto with a
handful of friends. Kenyatta does not look happy at all in this photo. I was
told that Pio had a falling out with Mzee long before this photo was taken.
Mzee had refused to see him previously and he was surprised to see Pio with the
League.
VETERAN Kenya-born journalist
*CYPRIAN FERNANDES celebrates the life of Pio Gama Pinto, Kenya’s first
political martyr who was assassinated 58 years ago on February 24, 1965.
THINGS THAT SHOULD NEVER HAVE
HAPPENED:
1. The
assassination of PGP was unnecessary, he was leaving for Mtwapa, Tanzania
anyway.
2. PGP
should never have had that stand-up slanging match with Jomo Kenyatta. He
should have known better.
IF THERE is a single beacon
alight, many, many decades from now, to evoke the name of Pio Gama Pinto, it
will be because of the saddest of irony: that Africa chose to murder the one
man who had two important lessons that could have saved the continent hundreds
and thousands of deaths and created nations in which all of their people shared
in the fruits of independence from the various colonialists.
His foremost vision was that
every single man, woman and child (of any colour, of any tribe, of any
religion, of any language) should be completely free, not just the few that
were opportunistically positioned to grab power and exploit it for the benefit
of the few. He always professed to be a complete African socialist.
However, it would seem in
hindsight, that his devotion and dedication to African socialism, particularly
sharing everything he had or owned was ridiculous, to say the least. At his
death, he owned nothing and did not have a single cent to his name in his bank
account.
He fed and clothed anyone who
needed his help including many who went on to high political office and were
counted among Kenya’s first millionaires. Even his Kenyan socialist colleagues
were clever enough to practise the cynical idiom: what is mine I keep, I share
everything else. No so-called Kenyan socialist was the beggar that Pio was in
the end.
Yet, he was able to beg from
various friendly nations, including India, and more importantly, the Kenyan Indian
merchant community and arm, clothe and provide for the Mau Mau rebellion. He
also provided the Mau Mau movement with strategic planning he later became
famous for.
Almost a few days after marrying
Emma Dias, he told her “intelligent women did not stay at home” and promptly
drafted her into secretarial college. It was these skills that provided the
bread-winning for the family, first with a private then replacing one of the
many British secretaries who were leaving Kenya after independence.
Like many prophets before him,
Pio Gama Pinto was shunned by his own community, the Goans in Kenya who were
more aligned to their Portuguese masters and fought with words (amongst
themselves in their clubs and through letters in the local media) to stop India
from annexing their homeland of Goa. Pio and the Goans mutually divorced each
other.
In October 1960, he led a campaign to disrupt the visit to Kenya of the
Vice Premier of Portugal Pedro Teotinio Pereira, a sabotage mission that was
opposed by the general Goan community.
Pereira was visiting at the invitation of the colonial government. His
main aim was to renew links with the Goans in Nairobi and Mombasa. His program
would see him officially open the Fort Jesus Museum in Mombasa and visit the
Vasco Da Gama (the first Portuguese to set foot in Kenya en route to his search
for spices) memorial in Malindi.
Pereira’s visit was pure Portuguese propaganda. Britain and Portugal
colluded to prop up each other’s claims to their respective patches in Africa.
Pereira had arranged the financing of the Fort Jesus Museum through the
Gulbenkian Foundation of which Pereira was the administrator. Some 30,000
pounds was made available. Fort Jesus was hijacked and forced into celebrations
marking 500th anniversary of the death of Prince Henry the Navigator. At stake
was Portugal’s colonial identity.
Pereira arrived in Kenya on a six-day visit (two in Nairobi and four at
the coast) on October 27, 1960.
In the media, the war was fought by the Goan Voice on the side of the
loyalists and the Goan Tribune for the East African Goan League. There was also
strong opposition to the visit by The Colonial Times and The Daily
Chronicle.
Pio’s links with the latter publication date back to 1953 when he became
editor. Both the Chronicle and the Times were owned by Indian merchants. It was
rich Indians who propped up Pio’s efforts, especially against the Portuguese.
In the weeks before the opening of the Fort Jesus museum, Pio made clear his
opposition to the visit. He challenged the contention by the Goan Overseas
Association that “Goans look to Portugal as their Fatherland.” Letters in the
East African Standard (then strongly a paper supporting colonial rule) stomped
on Pio’s East African Goan League as being unrepresentative. The letters were
like a knee into Pio’s groin.
Catholic priests, perhaps putting an unofficial spin on the subject, had
vilified socialists and communists as being akin to devil worshippers and told
the Goans that they should have nothing to do with them.
Pio had cut his political teeth
agitating against the Portuguese in Goa and against the British in Mumbai. When
Goa was freed, he was asked to come back and lead the new state. He declined,
saying that there was enough talent in Goa to do the right thing by the people.
Instead, having been born in
Nyeri, he decided he would dedicate his life to the country of his birth. Thus
was born his second lesson for Africa: total commitment to the country. His
vision was for one country: Kenya for Kenyans, tribe-neutral, religion-neutral,
colour-neutral, one people living the one shared dream.
To achieve this, he first shed
his Goan/Indian skin and grew a new one to his complete Kenyan persona, taking
the first steps by learning the proper Coast-style Swahili, at a time when
virtually all foreigners spoke the ugly kitchen version, pathetic.
It was not long before that Pio
was the respected confidante of Jomo Kenyatta, Tom Mboya, Harry Thuku,
Njenga Karume, Oginga Odinga, Achieng
Oneko, Mbiyu Koinange, James Gichuru, Dr Julius Kiano, Paul Ngei, and an army
of Kenyan politicians marching towards Kenya’s freedom. Before that, he had
already won the respect of several Mau Mau leaders who quickly recognised in
Pio a valuable ally.
His influence was such that he
was able to convince the Mau Mau leadership to leave the rural Indian
shopkeeper community safe even though the urban Indians had set up two Indian
units to fight the Mau Mau. One of the units actually killed two Mau Mau. However, this was put down to misadventure by
a few misguided Asians in Nairobi.
It wasn’t long before he was
working shoulder-to-shoulder with the Kenya African National Union elite, first
through the trade unions with the enigmatic Tom Mboya, later with Jomo Kenyatta
himself, Dr Julius Kiano, Mbiyu Koinange, James Gichuru and others. However,
his lifelong friends were Joseph Murumbi, Bildad Kaggia and Fred Kubai who
shared his vision of an African socialist Kenya. Soon after independence Kenya
was veering more and more towards a capitalist society under the guise of
non-existent African socialism, he found a kindred spirit in the Luo leader
Jaramogi Oginga Odinga.
He brought to Kenya politics a
single, uncompromising and nationalistic vision: that independence meant
independence from ignorance, poverty and disease for and for the few who
happened to be in the right place at the right time. His war against the
ravages of the early days of land-grabbing eventually cost him his life. Who is
not to say that if the fruits of Uhuru had been shared equitably Kenya’s recent
history would have been much less turbulent?
Successive Indian diplomats,
beginning with the illustrious Apa Pant who captured the imagination of the
Kenyan political leadership, had played a pivotal role in enhancing Pio’s
political aspirations by providing him with the means including money to pursue
his political dream. Pran lal Sheth, the outstanding Indian leader who was
forced to leave Kenya after independence, remained a political partner until
Pio’s death. He lit the pyre at Pio’s home to burn every scrap of paper Pio had
ever written or any correspondence written to him. Sheth did this with the aid
of another Pio disciple the economist Sarjit Singh Heyer. They did it
instinctively to protect Pio’s family and his allies.
That is indeed a tragedy because
very little or none of Pio’s written material exists today.
One of his closest friends was
Fitz de Souza, barrister and former Deputy Speaker of the Parliament. He was
also a kindred spirit who was able to mask his socialist ideals. Fitz de Souza
tried his best to shepherd Pio away from a confrontation with Jomo Kenyatta. He
reminded Pio that he did not have a tribe or an army of people behind him. Pio
was on his own, he told him.
IN February 1965, Tom Mboya, the
Economic Planning and Development minister, with the help of a couple of
American strategists had drawn up Sessional Paper No. 10 which was designed to
turn Kenya into a capitalist country. Kenya did become capitalist as a result.
There is mention that at some
stage, Pio once called Kenyatta a land-grabber… fuelling an already simmering
mutual dislike. In the meantime, Pio quit the Kenya African Union and joined
the opposition Kenya People’s Union which professed social ideals to a point
and was led by the experienced capitalist Oginga Odinga. Pio drew up plans for
the KPU to raise a motion of “no confidence” in Sessional Paper No. 10 and
President Kenyatta. The story goes that Pio and Kenyatta (with a group of
Ministers and other officers) ran into Pio in the grounds of Parliament House
and later Pio admitted that He “had called Jomo Kenyatta a bastard because Jomo
Kenyatta called me a bastard first.” The
angry exchanges between the two men could be heard even in the halls of
Parliament House that day.
For the life of me, I will never
be able to understand Pio’s moments of lunacy. He was always a quietly spoken
and a considered man. He was a skilled political strategist and he had to be a
very skilled man to work with the Mau Mau. It must be just a few seconds of an
emotional spat that fateful day that made him do what he did.
The issue of land redistribution
after Uhuru was political dynamite and it is possible that Parliament could
have passed a vote of “no confidence” but Jomo Kenyatta was always a supreme
political strategist who would have won the day.
When I heard about it, I thought
it was the dumbest thing ever. No human being could expect to remain alive
after abusing the first President of Kenya or threatening to “fix” him in
Parliament with a motion of no-confidence.
An excerpt from Fitz de Souza’s
book: Forward to Independence: “I reminded Pio of Kenyatta’s strength, of
the sacrifices and struggles he had made and his firm belief that sacrifices
and struggles he had made and his firm belief that the fruits of independence
should be his. I said, ‘Pio, I think you have a lot of good things to say, but
however much you say them, Kenyatta is not going to give up power or go away.
He is a very courageous man and would fight to the death to stay the leader if
he had to.
“So, don’t try to attack him morally and not
expect to get on his bad side, you are just wasting your time, it is not
possible to remove him.” It was on an afternoon in February, as I was taking a
break for tea outside the Parliament building, that I heard someone calling my
name. ‘Mr de Souza, come quickly please!’ Turning around I saw that a few
tables away an altercation had broken out between Pio and Kenyatta. Both men
were gesticulating and swearing, and as their voices rose, everyone on the
veranda could hear. Tom Mboya was standing nearby, now joined by several
onlookers. Pio, his face contorted with anger was shouting, ‘I’ll fix you!’
Kenyatta, equally incensed, was shouting back at him. I knew immediately what
they were arguing about: the English farms, which Pio claimed Kenyatta was
grabbing. Running up behind Pio, I put both my arms around him, trying to
restrain him and calm him down. When Kenyatta had gone, we sat down. I warned
him not to shout at Kenyatta again, as Kikuyus rarely forgive someone who
becomes their enemy. “In the eyes of most Africans,” I said, “you are just a
Muhindi, you are perfectly dispensable, but he is not.” I reminded him how at
almost every meeting, Kenyatta would ask the same rhetorical question: if a man
plants a tree, who has the right to claim the fruit of that tree when it has
grown? Ask any African, I told him, and they will say that Kenyatta has been
very little compensated for the sacrifices and hardship he has endured in the
struggle for independence. “If it comes to the push,” I said, “there’ll be two
shots fired at you and no one will remember you in a year’s time.” Pio shook
his head, “No, no, there would be a bloodbath.” I said, “Pio, you are
overestimating your position; maybe if you were a Kikuyu or a Luo, then yes,
there would be a backlash, but you’ve nobody to support you; like me, you’ve no
support in the Indian community and none outside it.”
Joe Murumbi cajoled Pio out of
hiding in Mombasa after the “bastard” spat in Parliament. Murumbi assured Pio
“that everything will be all right.” Pio would be safe and Murumbi would talk
to Jomo Kenyatta (who would listen to Murumbi) and all would be well. Broken-hearted,
Murumbi would eventually leave politics. He would late cry his heart out every
time he thought about Pio. The trade union visionary Makhan Singh shared Pio’s
vision. The academic and visionary Pheroze Nowrojee knew Pio from his earliest days, as a clerk, as a
hockey correspondent, editing the Chronicle. Pheroze remains the single witness
to the short life Pio lived.
There are many others who played
a part in his life, too many to mention here. However, there are two
outstanding people who helped make Pio who he was: his brother Rosario and his
wife Emma. Rosario walked in the shadow of his illustrious sibling, but he
provided the support Pio needed every single step of his life. If Rosario was
the silent martyr in the family, then Emma was the silent spirit. She provided
him with unconditional love as a wife, partner and mother and, as was the way
in those days, she went about without the support of her husband without
question, even though he did not provide even a single glimpse or the smallest
whisper into his political life.
There is still time for Kenya to
bring Pio Gama Pinto’s legacy to fruition for a better, more equitable and
happier Kenya but without the violence that cost him his life. It has to be
done with the will of maturity, the wisdom of hindsight, the vision of
foresight and the sheer, unadulterated love of Kenya, its flora, fauna, and
every single man woman and child: gender–neutral, colour-neutral,
tribe-neutral, class-neutral, religion-neutral, rich or not. A truly beautiful
paradise deserves a beautiful dream. Pio had one.
In the end, the was no place for
an Asian like Pio Gama Pinto in Kenya. He had planned to move to Mtwapa in
Tanzania to help the fight for freedom in the Southern Africa States. He never got there.
In the end, he would have left
Kenya, perhaps forever, they didn’t need to kill him.
*Fernandes, a front-line
journalist, has worked in Europe and Australia, where he now lives. You can
read more at his blog: www.headlinesofmylife.today
Comments
As spreading the wealth perhaps the Jap / China system of growing wealth with a strong monitoring regulation/authoritarian Chinese road map where rich people are are or Indian way where there is abject poverty the only solution I feel in India kidnapped the rich are favoured as in the Heindburg case now in India where
Coal dust has been taken over in Goa